The Political Mind
The science and psychology of politics
Navigation
  • About
  • Mind&Politics
  • G Scott Blakley
  • I. A. Grea
You are here: Home › Commentary › Anti-Federalists and Modern Conservatism, con’t.
← Anti-Federalists and Modern Conservatism
Factions, Homogeneity, Christian Nation, and the Anti-Federalists →

Anti-Federalists and Modern Conservatism, con’t.

March 21, 2012 | Filed under: Commentary and tagged with: anti-federalist, federalist, national greatness, standing army, Thomas Pangle

Continuing with Thomas Pangle’s course on the Constitution, I am struck by how modern populist conservatives, those with affinities with the Tea Party, for instance, seem to have a lot in common with the more democratic republicanism of the Anti-Federalists as Professor Pangle describes them; but also with the visions of national greatness which the Federalists were more likely to promote. I am curious about how these two strains of thought might intermingle and still remain compatible.

The Anti-Federalists believed in a democratic republic, opposing the stronger government that the Federalists imagined and the Constitution put into place. They seem to have an almost idyllic vision of citizenry in a small republic, little government, and lots of participatory democracy. While the Articles of Confederation were the ideal vehicle for this vision of the republic, the Constitutional Convention was convened because it was generally acknowledged that the Articles were not effective and the republic could not survive without at least a somewhat stronger central government. True to their conservative sentiments, the Anti-Federalists favored merely tinkering around the edges of the Articles, rather than a major overhaul.

But the Federalists insisted that the nation could not survive without a stronger central government. One of the main arguments they made was that the central government needed a standing, professional army, to defend the country in need, but also to fend off any ambitions other countries might entertain to subdue the American republic. The Federalists went further, if somewhat surreptitiously, promoting a stronger nation, hinting at a nation of grandeur to take its place among the great nations of history. The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, opposed a standing army, preferring state militias which could be called up in time of need.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Jacob Jefferson Jakes

← Anti-Federalists and Modern Conservatism
Factions, Homogeneity, Christian Nation, and the Anti-Federalists →

RSS Jonathan Haidt

  • Why The Righteous Mind may be the best common reading for incoming college students February 19, 2017 Jonathan Haidt

RSS George Lakoff

RSS Corey Robin

Jacob Jefferson Jakes

The Political Mind

  • View Jacob-Jefferson-Jakes-127488407357719’s profile on Facebook
  • View JacobJJakes’s profile on Twitter
  • View 118350928673473455810’s profile on Google+

Mind&Politics

  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Facebook
  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Twitter
  • View 107647165319384338834’s profile on Google+

Recent Posts

  • The Truth Behind the Curtain: Ken Ham, Antonin Scalia, and Milton Friedman find it February 20, 2017
  • “I Support Trump” July 31, 2016
  • GOP Media Warfare, Hierarchy, and Agriculture November 28, 2015
  • To the Heart of an Idea, Conservative and Liberal October 25, 2015
  • State Sovereignty and Constitutionally-limited Government September 7, 2015
  • “…of the United States…”: Creating a Nation July 27, 2014
  • I Would Not Throw the Fat Man Off the Bridge and onto the Trolley Tracks July 13, 2014
  • Shit Happens and Big Data July 12, 2014
  • Wittgenstein, Identity-Protection Cognition, and Understanding Rather than Persuading June 1, 2014
  • What if Piketty is Right? April 27, 2014

Recent Comments

  • gate.io on WSJ loves OWS
  • Sign Up for gate.io on Reciprocity, Deadbeats, and Banks
  • User Login on Taxes, Income, and Wealth
  • erc 1155 on What if Piketty is Right?
  • 交易所 on Wittgenstein, Identity-Protection Cognition, and Understanding Rather than Persuading
  • gate io on To the Heart of an Idea, Conservative and Liberal
  • แอ พ โซ เชีย ล ยอด นิยม on Introverts and Presidential Candidates
  • Novedades de gate io on Medieval Mysteries… and the Deserving
  • gate io вывод on Conservative Small Government Socialism
  • revu com on Wealth over Wages: Tax Fairness and the Romney Return

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Categories

Tags

1% abortion Adam Smith anti-federalist Articles of Confederation Avi Tuschman conservatism conservative conservative boredom conservative enthusiasm constitution critical thinking Daniel Kahneman David Brooks democracy Elvin Lim federalist federal taxes gay rights George Lakoff hobby lobby income inequality Jonathan Haidt Joshua Greene karma liberal libertarians Mitt Romney moral politics Moral Tribes natural law Newt GIngrich Occupy Wall Street Patrick Allitt pro-life racism robert reich Steven Pinker strict father model tax policy tax quintiles Tea Party The Lovers Quarrel Thomas Pangle virtue of muddling through

© 2023 The Political Mind

Powered by Esplanade Theme by One Designs and WordPress